For example after(prenominal) probation the states were allowed to legalize the drinking age as they saw fit. well-nigh went with the Minimum deglutition Age of 21, while other states went with 18-20. so in 1984 the Federal Government passed the Federal Underage Drinking Act (FUDAA). This withheld transportation funding for the states that did not conform to a Minimum Legal Drinking Age of 21 (MLDA21). This unsanded law was said to cut down on barter accidents and saves lives. In my opinion this was abuse of coercive federalism. It seems to the Federal Government blackmailing the state into changing their shaping. One source says that after the casual of the MLDA21 only the early conforming states to the law actually enter a decrease in deaths, and only for a diddle time. The states that held off on conforming to the new Act showed no change in the amount of deaths in their state.
Also second in September of 2010 President Obama proposed an $800 million dollar stimulus to Texas to help with didactics.
This proposal included that Texas would only receive the coin if the Governor agrees to continue the funding after the federal bullion runs out. This to me is a bribe! First of all the Texas Constitution states that:
word VIII, Sec. 6, Texas Constitution, money may not be withdrawn from the treasury unless it has been appropriated by the legislature, and an appropriation may not be for a term longer than two years.
Even though Texas education could definitely use the money, it would have been unconstitutional for Governor Perry to approve. It was and is against the Texas constitution to guarantee to fund something for more than two years. He also has to have it approved by the legislature....If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
0 comments:
Post a Comment